3R Based Learning Method (Reuse, Reduce, Recycle) In Enhancing Early Childhood Creativity

Authors

  • Hawila Rassi Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang Author
  • Taroci Neolaka Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang Author
  • Ariyanti Tafuli Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang Author
  • Merianus Maifani Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang Author
  • Debora Kamuilut Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang Author
  • Fredericksen Victoranto Amseke Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64690/e-mas.v2i2.841

Keywords:

3R-Based Learning Method, Creativity, Early Childhood Education, Environmental Learning, Ex Post Facto

Abstract

Background: Creativity is a fundamental aspect of early childhood development because it enables children to generate original ideas, solve problems, and express themselves through meaningful learning experiences. The 3R-Based learning method (Reuse, Reduce, Recycle) has emerged as an innovative and environmentally friendly instructional approach that encourages children to explore, reuse, and recycle materials while fostering creativity and environmental awareness. However, empirical evidence regarding its implementation in authentic early childhood education settings remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effect of the 3R-Based learning method on the creativity of children aged 4–5 years at PAUD Cahaya Pasar Tani Kolhua. Method: This quantitative study employed an ex post facto research design involving 25 children selected through total sampling. Data were collected using questionnaires measuring the implementation of the 3R-Based learning method and children's creativity and were analyzed using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression. Results: The findings revealed that the 3R-Based learning method had a positive and statistically significant effect on children's creativity (p = 0.002; p < 0.05). The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.342) indicated that the method explained 34.2% of the variance in children's creativity, while 65.8% was influenced by other factors. Novelty: This study provides empirical evidence of implementing the 3R-Based learning method through an ex post facto design in an authentic early childhood education setting by integrating environmental sustainability with creativity development. Conclusion: The 3R-Based learning method can effectively support early childhood creativity by providing meaningful, exploratory, and environmentally oriented learning experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amseke, F. V., Lelo, K., Seran, E., & Sakan, C. H. (2024). The effect of parental attachment and emotional competence on early childhood independence. Journal of Golden Age PAUD UHO Research, 7(1), 1–10. https://rgap.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/article/view/120/44

Andriani, F., & Kusumastuti, R. (2023). Early childhood creativity: A study of aspects of divergent thinking and imagination in PAUD institutions. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 7(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpaud.071.03

Bakara, R., & Hutagalung, T. (2023). The effect of learning based on recycled materials on the creativity of children aged 3–5 years in North Sumatra. Scientific Journal of Early Childhood Education, 8(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipaud.v8i2.3014

Hartati, S., & Maemunah, N. (2023). Optimizing the golden age through environment-based learning stimulation. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education, 5(2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpaudi.052.06

Hasibuan, M., & Tampubolon, D. (2022). Factors affecting creativity in children aged 4–5 years in PAUD institutions in Kupang City. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.062.08

Humau, Y. N., Muni Hermina, M. L., Maria Banunaek, Febi Priska Huki, & Amseke, F. V. (2024). The effect of STEAM learning on children's creativity. EDU-RILIGIA: E-MAS Journal (Early Childhood Education and Learning), 1(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.47006/er.v8i1.19806

Lumban Gaol, E., & Sinaga, H. (2022). The concept of creativity and creative thinking in early childhood. Journal of Child Educational Science, 4(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.17977/jipa.v4i1.2022

Lumban Tobing, R., Manalu, K., & Siregar, A. (2024). Development of early childhood creativity through natural material and used material exploration approaches. Obsesi Journal: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 8(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v8i3.4720

Manik, D., & Silaban, F. (2023). Piaget's pre-operational stage and its implications for stimulating creativity in children aged 4–5 years. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 7(3), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.073.10

Marbun, T., & Silitonga, Y. (2025). Used material management-based learning strategies for empowering early childhood creativity. Journal of Education and Environment, 11(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpl.v11i1.2025

Marpaung, E., Hutasoit, B., & Pasaribu, R. (2024). Implementation of environment-based 3R method on early childhood creativity in North Sumatra. Nusantara Early Childhood Education Journal, 10(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.23887/paudnusantara.v10i2.2024

Nababan, I., & Simangunsong, F. (2025). The urgency of implementing environmentally friendly learning methods on early childhood creativity. Journal of Education and Early Childhood Development, 5(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.29407/jppaud.v5i1.2025

Nadeak, V., & Purba, A. (2024). Implementation of the 3R approach assisted by natural material media in improving original thinking ability of early childhood. Obsesi Journal: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 8(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v8i4.5012

Nainggolan, K., & Purba, M. (2022). Implementation of national PAUD standards in developing children's creativity. Journal of Education and Early Childhood Learning, 5(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.26858/jppaud.v5i1.2022

Pangaribuan, S., & Hutabarat, L. (2023). Implementation of the 3R method in early childhood learning: An effectiveness study on divergent thinking ability. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 7(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.074.05

Pasaribu, H., & Manurung, T. (2024). Early childhood creativity ability: A study of aspects of idea originality and thinking fluency in PAUD institutions. Journal of Golden Age PAUD Research, 9(2), 33–46.

Sihombing, N., Lubis, R., & Saragih, M. (2023). The effect of environmental problem solving-based learning models on early childhood creativity in North Sumatra. Journal of Education and Culture, 9(2), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v9i2.2023

Sihotang, B., & Pardede, C. (2023). Differentiated learning in accommodating heterogeneity of early childhood creativity. Journal of Child Education, 11(2), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpa.v11i2.2023

Simanjuntak, O., Tarigan, R., & Damanik, F. (2023). Variation of contextual learning media in developing early childhood creativity. Scientific Journal of Basic Education, 10(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.10.2.101-114

Situmorang, Y., & Aritonang, D. (2022). Zone of proximal development and mentoring in creative learning for early childhood. Journal of Educational Science, 30(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v30i2.2022

Tampubolon, J., & Sitorus, E. (2023). The effect of learning models based on used goods management on the creativity of children aged 4–5 years in Bandung City PAUD. Scientific Journal of Basic Education, 12(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.12.1.60-73

Wibisana, A., Putranti, D., & Kuswanto, H. (2023). Munandar and the development of early childhood creativity through a play approach. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education, 4(2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpaudi.042.07

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hawila Rassi, Taroci Neolaka, Ariyanti Tafuli, Merianus Maifani, Debora Kamuilut, & Fredericksen Victoranto Amseke. (2026). 3R Based Learning Method (Reuse, Reduce, Recycle) In Enhancing Early Childhood Creativity. Jurnal E-MAS (Edukasi Dan Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini), 2(2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.64690/e-mas.v2i2.841