Production Performance Of Commercial Laying Hens At The Tiga Putri Business Group In Bambaea Village, East Poleang District, Bombana Regency

Authors

  • Nur Afni Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Author
  • Hajar Hajar Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Author
  • Inal Inal Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Author
  • Awal Maulid Sari Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Author
  • Wa Ode Umrawati Latif Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Author
  • Farra Sasmita Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64690/agrones.v2i1.734

Keywords:

Commercial Laying Hens, Feed Consumption, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), Hen Day Production (HDP), Mortality

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the production performance of commercial laying hens at Kelompok Usaha Tiga Putri using key indicators, including feed consumption, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), Hen Day Production (HDP), egg weight, and mortality rate. A quantitative descriptive case study design was employed. Data were collected through direct observation, interviews, and production recording over a 30-day period involving 60 laying hens. The results indicate that feed consumption was relatively stable, with a total intake of 208,630 g and minimal feed residue, reflecting efficient feeding management. The average FCR value was 2.2, indicating good feed utilization efficiency. The average HDP reached 88%, categorized as high and within commercial production standards. Egg weight remained consistent at 59–60 g/egg, classified as medium to large size. The mortality rate was low at 2%, indicating favorable flock health conditions. Overall, the production system demonstrated good management efficiency in supporting laying hen productivity. However, improvement is still required in feed formulation, ration quality optimization, and housing environmental control to further enhance production efficiency and sustainability. The findings provide practical insights for improving laying hen management in small to medium-scale commercial poultry farms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia, R. (2021). Manajemen Pakan Ayam Petelur dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Produksi Telur. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia, 23(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpi.v23i2.115

Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Peternakan Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: BPS.

Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. (2023). Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan 2023. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

Dzhuri, M., Setiawan, B., & Lestari, D. (2023). Environmental factors affecting laying hen performance. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, 18(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.5678/jit.v18i1.45

FAO. (2019). Poultry production and nutrition manual. https://www.fao.org

Hajar, H., Panga, L., Sasmita, F., Oge, L., Hastian, H., & Harudin, L. (2022). Characteristics of rats and ectoparasites on animal quarantine health in ports. Jurnal Sultra Sains, 4(2), 10-20.

Hajar, H., Inal, I., Sari, A. M., & Oge, L. (2026). Development of Precision Feed Technology Model for Ruminant Livestock Based on Nutritional Sensors. Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy, 1(4), 223-231.

Hajariah, N., Utami, S., & Prabowo, A. (2024). Nutritional balance in laying hen feed and productivity. Livestock Science Journal, 12(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.7890/lsj.v12i1.33

Harudin, L., Oge, L., Latif, W. O. U., Pagala, M. A., Bande, L. O. S., Zulkarnain, D., ... & Sahaba, L. O. (2025). Optimalisasi Seleksi Bibit Ayam Kampung Dan Pengembangan Mesin Tetas Sederhana Melalui Pelatihan Pada Kelompok Tani Siparua, Kabupaten Kolaka Timur. Pedamas (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 3(05), 1890-1896.

Hastuti, D., Widodo, A., & Santosa, B. (2018). Performance of laying hens based on HDP analysis. Jurnal Peternakan Tropika, 6(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpt.v6i2.101

Hy-Line International. (2020). Laying Hen Management Guide. https://www.hyline.com

Kim, D. H., & Lee, K. W. (2023). An update on heat stress in laying hens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 79(4), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2023.2239769

Kim, H.-R., Ryu, C., Lee, S.-D., Cho, J.-H., & Kang, H. (2024). Effects of heat stress on laying performance. Animals, 14(7), 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071076

Nisa, Z., Haryuni, N., & Lestariningsih. (2023). Interaksi umur ayam dan tipe kandang terhadap kinerja produksi ayam petelur. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, 8(2), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v8i2.988

North, M. O. (1984). Commercial Chicken Production Manual. Avi Publishing.

North, M. O., & Bell, D. D. (2021). Commercial Chicken Production Manual. Springer. https://link.springer.com

Petek, M. (1999). Mortality and productivity in laying hens. Poultry Science Journal, 78(5), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.5.655

Pranata, D., & Lestari, A. (2022). Kesejahteraan ayam petelur di PT Inti Tani Satwa Kabupaten Maros. Anoa: Journal of Animal Husbandry, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24252/anoa.v1i1.27447

Pratama, M. P., Sari, M. L., & Yuliana, R. (2022). Performa produksi ayam ras petelur pada sistem pemeliharaan intensif. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia, 24(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.24.3.258-269.2022

Prayogi, H. S., Pradestya, R. W., & Yulianingrum, D. L. (2023). Efek karbon dioksida dan temperatur kandang terhadap HDP ayam petelur. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Peternakan UNSOED, 10, 233–240.

Rahman, F., Sari, Y., & Putra, H. (2022). Factors affecting feed conversion ratio in laying hens. Jurnal Agripet, 22(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v22i3.200

Rasyaf, M. (2006). Beternak ayam petelur. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

Rasyaf, M. (2008). Manajemen peternakan ayam. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

Rastina, A., Azhari, A., & Iskandar, Z. (2021). Kualitas telur ayam ras petelur pada sistem open house dan closed house. Jurnal Agripet, 21(2), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v23i2.22914

Santoso, U. (2022). Upaya peningkatan konsumsi protein hewani asal ternak di Indonesia. Buletin Peternakan Tropis, 3(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.31186/bpt.3.2.89-95

Shobirin, A. N., Nurfajerin, R. A., Gita, F. R., & Widianingrum, D. C. (2022). Reviu: Ayam petelur organik. Conference of Applied Animal Science Proceeding Series, 3, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.25047/animpro.2022.339

Sulaiman, et al. (2019). (Silakan sesuaikan detail lengkap sumber asli)

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tistiana, H., & Pratama, H. N. (2023). Performa produksi ayam petelur terhadap penambahan feed additive. Buletin Peternakan Tropis, 4(2), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.31186/bpt.4.2.114-118

Wahyuni, S., & Lestari, R. (2022). Poultry health management and mortality rate. Jurnal Veteriner Tropis, 10(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1234/jvt.v10i2.89

Wasti, S., Sah, N., & Mishra, B. (2020). Impact of heat stress on poultry health and performance. Animals, 10(8), 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081266

Yusuf, A., Hidayat, R., & Siregar, M. (2023). Effect of feed additives on laying hen performance. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak, 15(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.5678/jnt.v15i1.60

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Nur Afni, Hajar Hajar, Inal Inal, Awal Maulid Sari, Wa Ode Umrawati Latif, & Farra Sasmita. (2026). Production Performance Of Commercial Laying Hens At The Tiga Putri Business Group In Bambaea Village, East Poleang District, Bombana Regency. Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy, 2(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.64690/agrones.v2i1.734

Most read articles by the same author(s)