Development of Precision Feed Technology Model for Ruminant Livestock Based on Nutritional Sensors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64690/agrones.v1i4.627Keywords:
Precision Feeding, Ruminant Livestock, Nutritional Sensors, Precision Feeding Model, Livestock TechnologyAbstract
Feeding is a key factor in ruminant livestock production systems, often ignoring the variations in individual nutritional needs of livestock, reducing efficiency and increasing feed waste. Therefore, this study aims to examine and develop a precision feeding technology model concept for ruminant livestock based on nutritional sensors through a descriptive-interpretive approach based on the latest scientific literature. The results show that the use of nutritional sensors, rumen sensors, feed consumption sensors, and feeding behavior sensors allows for real-time monitoring of livestock physiological conditions and nutritional status. Integration of sensor data into an adaptive nutrition model has been shown to improve the accuracy of estimating individual nutritional requirements, reduce the risk of overfeeding and underfeeding, and increase feed efficiency. Further discussion shows that although precision feeding technology has developed rapidly, its application is still dominated by intensive livestock systems in developed countries.
Downloads
References
Cannas, A., Tedeschi, L. O., & Atzori, A. S. (2019). How can nutrition models increase the production efficiency of sheep and goat operations? Animal Frontiers, 9(2), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz005
Condotta, I. C. F. S., & Tedeschi, L. O. (2025). Mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: AI-driven precision feeding. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf441
Dagel, A. K. (2023). Evaluating precision supplementation technology and mathematical nutrition models for heifer development. South Dakota State University.
Empel, M. J., et al. (2016). Nutritional and technological parameters for precision feeding. CABI Reviews.
Fernandes, M. H. M. R., & Tedeschi, L. O. (2025). Application of modeling innovations to support sustainable grazing cattle systems. Journal of Animal Science.
González, L. A., Kyriazakis, I., & Tedeschi, L. O. (2018). Precision nutrition of ruminants: Approaches, challenges and potential gains. Animal, 12(2), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002288
Kaur, U., et al. (2023). Integration of technologies for precision animal agriculture. Journal of Animal Science.
Knight, C. H. (2020). Sensor techniques in ruminants. Animal, 14(3), 1–10.
Liebe, D. M., & White, R. R. (2019). Analytics in sustainable precision animal nutrition. Animal Frontiers, 9(2), 16–23.
Makinde, A. (2020). Challenges in adoption of precision livestock farming. University of Guelph.
Menendez, H. M., et al. (2022). Mathematical modeling in animal nutrition. Journal of Animal Science, 100(6).
Oge, L. (2025). Pengembangan teknologi pascapanen berbasis kearifan lokal dalam mendukung ketahanan pangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Mahasiswa dan Akademisi, 1(4), 46–56.
Oge, L. (2025). Postharvest physiological studies on the quality and shelf life of tropical fruits: A literature review. Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy, 1(1), 18–27.
Ojo, A. O., Mulim, H. A., Campos, G. S., & Junqueira, V. S. (2024). Exploring feed efficiency in beef cattle. Animals, 14(24), 3633.
Pomar, C., & Remus, A. (2023). Fundamentals, limitations and pitfalls of precision nutrition techniques. Animal, 17, 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100780
Rao, S., & Neethirajan, S. (2025). Computational architectures for precision dairy nutrition digital twins. Sensors, 25(16), 4899.
Sahir, S. H. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian. Bantul: Penerbit KBM Indonesia.
Sonea, C., Gheorghe-Irimia, R. A., & Tapaloaga, D. (2023). Optimizing animal nutrition through precision feeding. Annals of Valahia University, 17(1), 45–58.
Tedeschi, L. O., & Greenwood, P. L. (2021). Advancements in sensor technology and decision-support tools. Journal of Animal Science, 99(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab038
Wahyudin, C. I., & Oge, L. (2025). Utilization of oil palm waste as a renewable energy source: A current literature review. Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy, 1(2), 70–81.
Zhang, S., Lai, C., Zhao, J., & Wang, J. (2025). Big data and AI-powered modeling in animal nutrition. Advanced Science, 12(4), 2307564.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hajar Hajar, Inal Inal, Awal Maulid Sari, La Oge (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Amal Muliono, La Oge, Erni Danggi, Rustan Ari, Hastian Hastian, Wa Ode Nur Siti Fatimah, The Effect of the Biomass Weight Ratio of Patchouli Leaves and Sawdust on the Chemical Properties of Patchouli Briquettes , Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): April - June 2026 Edition
- Nur Afni, Hajar Hajar, Inal Inal, Awal Maulid Sari, Wa Ode Umrawati Latif, Farra Sasmita, Production Performance Of Commercial Laying Hens At The Tiga Putri Business Group In Bambaea Village, East Poleang District, Bombana Regency , Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): April - June 2026 Edition
.png)








